Cybercab engineering: what is shipped, and what is still a claim

Discussions about the Cybercab tend to blur what Tesla has demonstrated with what it has projected. Pulling those apart is worth doing. Shipped and observable: - No steering wheel, no pedals, no mirrors. Camera-only perception, no radar or lidar. - Two seats, butterfly doors, a 22-inch screen. - A drive motor that uses no rare-earth metals. - The "unboxed" assembly process, which Tesla says roughly halves the line. - 300+ vehicles carrying passengers in Austin as of 10 October. Numbers about the vehicle itself: - Step-in height 16.5 inches, ground clearance 5.8 inches - Head room 38.3 inches, leg room 43.4 inches - Rear trunk 20.2 cubic feet - Drive units leaving the line every 10 seconds, per Tesla Claims still to be tested: - "The most efficient EV ever certified." Not verifiable without the certification data, and I have not seen independent confirmation published anywhere. - The 2 to 4 million vehicles a year ambition. Stated capacity is 125,000. An ambition is not a factory. - "Several times more Cybercabs per year than all our other vehicles combined." Same problem. - Whether the cost structure really lands under $30,000 at volume. No price announced. The interesting argument is not whether the claims are impressive. It is which ones are load-bearing. If the unboxed process and the rare-earth-free motor are what make the economics work, then the cost target depends on manufacturing rather than on autonomy - and that is something you can actually argue about with evidence. What have I got wrong, or what am I missing?